Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 507 So. 2d 749 - Fouraker v. Carter

507 So. 2d 749 - Fouraker v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hutton · Kaluza v. Wronski · 62 Ill. App. 3d 267 - In Re Estate of Kaluza · Foley v. Silvagni · In Re Silvagni's Estate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After letters have been granted in either a testate or an intestate estate, if any will is subsequently admitted to probate the letters shall be revoked and new letters granted as provided in subsection (1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Upon admission of the will, the personal representative nominated by the will is entitled to preference of appointment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “when a later discovered will is admitted to probate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.