Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 507 So. 2d 769 - K.C. v. State

507 So. 2d 769 - K.C. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1988
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 402 So. 2d 593 - K. M. S. v. STATE · 458 So. 2d 343 - R.A.S. v. State · King v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n individual who resists the reasonable effort of a law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant’s employee, or farmer to recover merchandise or farm produce which the law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant’s employee or farmer had probable cause to believe the individual had concealed or removed from its place of display or elsewhere and who is subsequently found to be guilty of theft of the subject merchandise or farm produce is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, ... unless the individual did not know, or did not have reason to know, that the person seeking to recover the merchandise or farm produce was a law enforcement officer, merchant, merchant’s employee, or farmer. (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.