Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 507 SO2D 982 - Hayes v. State

Hayes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
August 1994
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Van Riper v. United States · Ex Parte Cofer · 358 So. 2d 782 - Van Antwerp v. State · Ex Parte Van Antwerp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Following the conclusion of the hearing at which the State and the defendant each presented witnesses, the trial court made findings that, in fact, a proper indictment had been returned and was in proper form and that this was the ‘Hayes-Redmond indictment.’ This was stipulated. See Record [, page 7] of Exhibit A, Supplemental Transcript. “In light of the stipulation which was filed and is a part of this record on appeal and the findings of the trial judge as to what actually transpired in the Grand Jury, this court finds no violation of any statute with reference to the Grand Jury proceedings in this State. See Sections 12-16-190 through 12-16-233, Code of Alabama 1975 as amended.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.