Foster v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 1985
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · Vaca v. Sipes · Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning Commission v. Coin · Wahl v. Commonwealth · Haley v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Foster filed a supplemental brief, pro se, in which he claims ineffective assistance of his trial counsel (a different lawyer than the ones prosecuting this appeal.) The trial court was not made aware of this complaint during the trial nor was this contention contained in the motion for a new trial, therefore this ground was not preserved for appellate review. RCr 9.22. * * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.