Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 507 S.W.2d 521 - Robinson v. Hill

Robinson v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

88 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Ex Parte Granviel (1978), Trinity River Authority v. URS Consultants, Inc. (1994)

88 state decisions

34019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Davis · Key Western Life Insurance v. State Board of Insurance · State v. City of Austin · Brown v. City of Galveston · Miller v. County of El Paso

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In passing upon the constitutionality of a statute, we begin with a presumption of validity. It is to be presumed that the Legislature has not acted unreasonably or arbitrarily, and the burden is on one who challenges an act to establish its unconstitutionality."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““No bill ... shall contain more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In each instance where a principal has been rearrested and returned to the county wherein his bond was made within 120 days after the date of the final judgment on the bond forfeiture and no appeal has been taken and provided that the principal was rearrested as a result of money spent or information furnished by the surety, the surety thereon may file a motion of remittance in the court commanding the appearance of the principal and the court shall order at least 50 percent of the amount paid on the judgment remitted. The payment shall be made by the county treasurer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.