Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 507 SW2D 600 - Bowen v. Young

Bowen v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
5
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2011 · most notably Ucc v. Arkwright-Boston Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, Lanphier Construction Co. v. Fowco Construction Co. (1975)

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 18 state decisions

12019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 78 Wash. 2d 343 - Hays Merchandise, Inc. v. Dewey · Park County Implement Co. v. Craig · Marbelite Co. v. Philadelphia · Ingle v. Marked Tree Equipment Co. · Melody Home Manufacturing Co. v. Morrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “express warranties rest on ‘dickered’ aspects of the individual bargain, and go so clearly to the essence of that bargain that words of disclaimer in the purchase agreement are repugnant to the basic dickered terms.” Id. at 605 . In Mobile Housing, Inc. v. Stone, 490 S.W.2d 611 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1973, no writ), the contract said no descriptions, samples, or models were part of contract and specified that mobile home was sold”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]f the goods or the tender of delivery fail in any respect to conform to the contract, the buyer may (1) reject the whole.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.