Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 507 U.S. 170 - Reves v. Ernst & Young

Reves v. Ernst & Young’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

2,175
cited by 2,175 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
18
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

550 federal appellate · 314 district · 88 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,175 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler (1994), Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore. (1995)

550 federal appellate · 314 district · 88 state decisions — followed in 18 states

90401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedArthur Young & Co. v. Reves (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · United States v. Turkette · Russello v. United States

Cited together with Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · United States v. Turkette · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Conley v. Gibson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,175 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “some part in directing the enterprise's affairs.”
    165 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise's affairs,”
    39 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.”
    34 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.