United States v. Bohn’s Empirical Analysis
508 F.2d 1145 · 1975
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently December 2011 · most notably United States v. Lincoln (1980), United States v. O'Connell (1988)
43 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1955 · 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on United States v. Cox · United States v. Sacco · United States v. Brick · United States v. Michael A. Riehl, Appeal of Arthur J. Rinaldi. Appeal of James L. Chick · United States v. Wolk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[AJbsent a clear showing of prejudice, a failure to comply with the notice and inventory requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (8)(d) does not require suppression of the wiretap evidence . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hicks v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.