Maita v. Whitmore’s Empirical Analysis
508 F.2d 143 · 1974
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 1996
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Baldwin v. New York · Taylor v. Hayes · Codispoti v. Pennsylvania · Frank v. United States · United States v. Seale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it makes no difference that the trial judge at first imposes consecutive sentences totalling more than six months, if he [or she] afterward reduces them to six month sentences to be served concurrently; jury trial is not required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rife v. Rg Godbehere
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.