United States v. Honneus’s Empirical Analysis
508 F.2d 566 · 1974
Citation profile
158 federal appellate · 8 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 203 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably United States v. Petrozziello (1977), United States v. Drougas (1984)
158 federal appellate · 8 district · 24 state decisions — followed in 15 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3237 · 18 U.S.C. § 3238 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 545 · 18 U.S.C. § 7 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 21 U.S.C. § 963
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · American Tobacco Co. v. United States · Alford v. United States · Lutwak v. United States · Braverman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 203 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““minimum obligation on the trial judge in a conspiracy case in which extrajudicial statements of alleged co-conspirators are proffered to give a cautionary instruction on the limited uses of hearsay testimony, explaining clearly to the jury the requirement that the conspiracy itself and each defendant’s participation in it must be established by independent non-hearsay evidence which must be given either prior to the introduction of any evidence or immediately upon the first instance of such hearsay testimony.” 476 F.2d at 163 .”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(t)he Apollo rule should . . . be observed in conspiracy cases hereafter tried in this circuit. Failure to do so will result in reversal in any case where we believe the omission to have affected substantial rights.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`We are persuaded that Congress adopted "Cannabis sativa L.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.