Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 508 F.3d 1012 - Albritton v. Cagle's, Inc.

Albritton v. Cagle's, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

508 F.3d 1012 · 2007

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2023

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

110200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)

Relies on Christopher Artuz Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility v. Tony Bruce Bennett · Fedorenko v. United States · IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez · Harris v. Garner · David Hipp Brad Stein v. Liberty National Life Insurance Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ § 216(b) ] instructs us that, "No employee shall be a party plaintiff to any such action [under the Fair Labor Standards Act] unless he gives his consent in writing to become such a party and such consent is filed in the court in which such action is brought." 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) (emphasis added). When the attorneys filed these two new lawsuits, they commenced new actions-distinct from the original [ ] action to which the plaintiffs had consented to opt into and be bound by. Having initiated new actions, § 216(b) required the attorneys to file new consents with the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the lesson from Prickett is that we must interpret consent forms according to the plain meaning of their language.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.