Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 508 F.3d 106 - Patane v. Clark

Patane v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

508 F.3d 106 · 2007

Citation profile

302
cited by 302 later decisions
September 2023
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 18 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 302 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Kaytor v. Electric Boat Corp. (2010), Holmes v. Grubman (2009)

11 federal appellate · 18 district ·

2270200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Foman v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 302 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a plaintiff must plead facts that would tend to show the complained of conduct: (1) is objectively severe or pervasive— that is, creates an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive; (2) creates an environment that the plaintiff subjectively perceives as hostile or abusive; and (3) creates such an environment because of the plaintiffs sex.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`ha[s] repeatedly cautioned against setting the bar too high' in this context.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To state a claim for retaliation in violation of Title VII, a plaintiff must plead facts that would tend to show that: (1) she participated in a protected activity known to the defendant; (2) the defendant took an employment action disadvantaging her; and (3) there exists a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.