Sekiya v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis
508 F.3d 1198 · 2007
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2024
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Brooks v. City of San Mateo · N/s Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company · O'Brien v. M · Nunes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Bare assertions and lists of facts unaccompanied by analysis and completely devoid of caselaw fall far short of the requirement that counsel present 'appellant's contentions and the reasons for them.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The appellant’s brief must contain ... appellant’s contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is not 'entitled to have [the Court] expatiate on [its] reasons for finding [her] case unmeritorious.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Greenstein
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.