Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 508 F.3d 136 - United States v. Ali

United States v. Ali’s Empirical Analysis

508 F.3d 136 · 2007

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
April 2023
most recently cited

18 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably United States v. Wise (2008), United States v. Langford (2008)

18 federal appellate ·

270200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1621 · 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Rita v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While a party can waive his or her ability to appeal a ruling for failure to object, there can be no waiver ... of the Judge's duty to apply the correct legal standard.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “By excising the provisions of the United States Code requiring mandatory application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, the Supreme Court in [United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)] altered the constitutional impact of the Guidelines. None of the facts relevant to enhancements or departures under the Guidelines can increase the maximum punishment to which the defendant is exposed. The Due Process Clause thus affords no right to have these facts proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.