GO Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
508 F.3d 170 · 2007
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Goode v. Central Virginia Legal Aid Society, Inc. (2015), McLean v. United States (2009)
10 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 15B (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 16 (§ 5 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · Holmberg v. Armbrecht · Bailey Assignee v. Glover et al. · Domino Sugar Corporation v. Sugar Workers Local Union of United Food and Commercial Workers International Union · Pocahontas Supreme Coal Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]nquiry notice ... charges a person to investigate when the information at hand would have prompted a reasonable person to do so.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]here a plaintiff knows of a pattern of particular actions that a defendant has taken against him, though the pattern's precise scope might be unclear and its exact legal ramifications uncertain, the plaintiff is on inquiry notice of his claim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[N]othing in [our precedent] excuses a negligent plaintiff from the diligence requirement[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.