Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 508 F.3d 225 - Ratliff v. Stewart

Ratliff v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis

508 F.3d 225 · 2007

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
June 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2020

2 federal appellate ·

90200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Sprage v. Ticonic Nat Bank · White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security · Willy v. Coastal Corp. · Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘Improper purpose’ does not necessarily refer to bad faith or intent to harass. Vexation implies something broader than that. To ‘vex’ is defined, among others things, as ‘to bring trouble or distress to,’ ‘to subject to mental suffering,’ or ‘to irritate or annoy,’ as well as ‘to tease or torment.’ Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language 2548 (1981). Consistent with this, in Calhoun we did not hold that the only way to establish an ‘improper purpose’ is by showing bad faith. Indeed, any ‘reckless disregard of the duty owed to the court’ can suffice. Edwards v. Gen. Motors Corp., 153 F.3d 242, 246 (5th Cir.1998).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.