Gardner v. UICI’s Empirical Analysis
508 F.3d 559 · 2007
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Relies on Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp. · Ritchey v. Upjohn Drug Co. · 111 Cal. App. 3d 498 - Younan v. Equifax Inc. · Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc. · 111 Cal. App. 4th 102 - People Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Beaumont Investment, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]here is no reason to suppose Congress meant to confer a right to remove, while at the same time discouraging its exercise in all but obvious cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under Martin , however, whether a removal is improper is not dispositive in determining whether fees should be awarded under 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.