Dunning v. Quander’s Empirical Analysis
508 F.3d 8 · 2007
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 11 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2021
3 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 3307
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Koon v. United States · Strang v. United States Arms Control & Disarmament Agency · Twist v. Meese · Chappell-Johnson v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]ithout some reason to question the veracity of affiants, ... [plaintiffl’s desire to test and elaborate affiants’ testimony falls short.”) (alterations in original) (internal quotation marks omitted). 12 . Plaintiffs’ unfounded allegations that defendant’s attorneys fabricated evidence of the decision to terminate Cannon (see, e.g., Reply in Support of Renewed Mot. for a Preliminary Injunction at 4 n. 3 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.