Mufied v. Mukasey’s Empirical Analysis
508 F.3d 88 · 2007
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 147 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Jian Hui Shao v. Mukasey (2008), Wakkary v. Holder (2009)
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice · Gonzales v. Thomas · Ivanishvili v. United States Department of Justice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 147 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a systematic, pervasive, or organized effort to kill, imprison, or severely injure members of the protected group, and this effort must be perpetrated or tolerated by state actors”) (internal quotation marks omitted); Lie v. Ashcroft, 396 F.3d 530 , 537 (3d Cir.2005) (holding that a pattern or practice must be “systematic, pervasive, or organized”); Woldemeskel v. INS, 257 F.3d 1185 , 1191 (10th Cir.2001) (a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wakkary v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.