Nascimento v. Dummer’s Empirical Analysis
508 F.3d 905 · 2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1406
Relies on Hall v. Beals · United States v. Wallace & Tiernan Co. · Malone v. United States Postal Service · Ruby v. Secretary of the United States Navy · David v. Hooker, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[P]etitions for extraordinary writs do not destroy the district court's jurisdiction in the underlying case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ogeone v. Au
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.