United States v. Marcano’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1861 (Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968) · 28 U.S.C. § 1864 · 28 U.S.C. § 1865 · 28 U.S.C. § 1867 · 48 U.S.C. § 864
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Swain v. State of Alabama · Hamling v. United States · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Taylor v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nothing in this section shall preclude any person or the United States from pursuing any other remedy, civil or criminal, which may be available for the vindication or enforcement of any law prohibiting discrimination on account of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or economic status in the selection of persons for service on grand or petit juries.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“persons of the working class or of lower socioeconomic status”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Anaya v. Hansen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.