McKenzie v. Saylor’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Reamer v. Beall · Rush Pettway, Etc. v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor · Bundy v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) general eligibility to apply for the training or promotion by virtue of the position held by the would-be applicant at that time (e.g., journeymen applying for an uprate position); (ii) formal application for other, similar training or promotion opportunities submitted in the same proximate time period; and/or (iii) that the claimant notified appropriate supervisory officials of his or her interest in being considered for future opportunities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) general eligibility to apply for the training or promotion by virtue of the position held by the would-be applicant at that time; . .. (b) formal application for other, similar training or promotion opportunities; and/or (c) that the claimant notified appropriate supervisory officials of his or her interest in being considered for future opportunities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McKenzie v. Sawyer“group was to be drawn from journeymen with at least one year's experience. It was to include at least 20 journeymen, or 10% of all journeymen with the requisite experience, leave, and disciplinary records, whichever number was larger. For positions at the level of foreman or above, the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McKenzie v. Sawyer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.