Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 508 NE2D 17 - Duff v. State

Duff v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2008

11 state decisions

50198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission · Maldonado v. State · Haywood v. United States · Hall v. State · Miller v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a habitual offender proceeding, the jury must not only determine whether the defendant has been twice previously convicted of unrelated crimes, but it must further determine whether such two convictions, when considered along with the defendant’s guilt of the charged crime, lead them to find that the defendant is a habitual criminal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If only part of a deposition is offered in evidence by a party, an adverse party may require him to introduce any other part which ought in context to be considered with the part introduced, and any party may introduce any other part.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “unquestioned right of a jury to refuse, to find defendant a habitual offender even with uncontroverted proof of the prerequisite prior felony convictions”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.