Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 508 NE2D 41 - Mendez v. State

Mendez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1988
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Alfaro v. State · Lámar v. State · Lamar v. State · Wallace v. State · 182 Ind. App. 62 - Spence v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that the recording is authentic and correct; (2) that the testimony elicited was freely and voluntarily made, without any kind of duress; (3) that all required warnings were given and all necessary acknowledgements and waivers were knowingly and intelligently given; (4) that it does not contain matter otherwise not admissible into evidence; and (5) that it is of such clarity as to be intelligible and enlightening to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.