Mendez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1988
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Alfaro v. State · Lámar v. State · Lamar v. State · Wallace v. State · 182 Ind. App. 62 - Spence v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that the recording is authentic and correct; (2) that the testimony elicited was freely and voluntarily made, without any kind of duress; (3) that all required warnings were given and all necessary acknowledgements and waivers were knowingly and intelligently given; (4) that it does not contain matter otherwise not admissible into evidence; and (5) that it is of such clarity as to be intelligible and enlightening to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bates v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.