Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 508 Pa. 623 - Estep v. Estep

Estep v. Estep’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2008 · most notably Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com. (1986), Commonwealth v. Rhodes (1986)

32 state decisions

180198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wiegand v. Wiegand · Thornburgh v. Lewis · 326 Pa. Super. 404 - Estep v. Estep · Chwatek v. Parks · State v. Sheehan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “improperly interjected a legal theory not otherwise considered or preserved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.