State v. Falls’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2000
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · State v. Oliveaux · 441 So. 2d 732 - State v. Lynch · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is used in the statutes proscribing the following crimes: simple burglary, La.R.S. 14:62; simple burglary of a pharmacy, La. R.S. 14:62.1; simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling, La.R.S. 14:62.2; unauthorized entry of an inhabited dwelling, La.R.S. 14:62.3; and unauthorized entry of a place of business, La.R.S. 14:62.4. The legislature obviously intended the same meaning for each by the use of the same phrase. Other jurisdictions have defined”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Abrams“[whenever] appellant raises the issue of sufficiency through his assignments of error, we are constrained to review the record in this regard in light of [ State v. Raymo [ 419 So.2d 858, 861 (La.1982)].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gaines“intentional entry by a person without authorization into any inhabited dwelling or other structure belonging to another and used in whole or in part as a home or place of abode by a person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.