Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 508 So. 2d 1292 - Smith v. State

508 So. 2d 1292 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2003

10 state decisions

40198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Beverly · 507 So. 2d 759 - Nash Pontiac-Cadillac v. Lamb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) CRITERIA.—A person may be involuntarily placed for treatment upon a finding of the court by clear and convincing evidence that: (a) He is mentally ill and because of his mental illness: 1.a. He has refused voluntary placement for treatment after sufficient and conscientious explanation and disclosure of the purpose of placement for treatment; or b. He is unable to determine for himself whether placement is necessary; and 2.a. He is manifestly incapable of surviving alone or with the help of willing and responsible family or friends, including available alternative services, and, without treatment, he is likely to suffer from neglect or refuse to care for himself, and such neglect or refusal poses a real and present threat of substantial harm to his well-being; or b. There is substantial likelihood that in the near future he will inflict serious bodily harm on himself or another person, as evidenced by recent behavior causing, attempting, or threatening such harm; and (b) All available less restrictive treatment alternatives which would offer an opportunity for improvement of his condition have been judged to be inappropriate.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.