Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 508 So. 2d 345 - Frazier v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.

508 So. 2d 345 - Frazier v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2005

17 state decisions

90198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 402 So. 2d 606 - State v. Hawkins · Green v. State · 315 So. 2d 492 - Fiber Crete Homes, Inc. v. DIVISON OF ADM., DEPT. OF TR. · Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc. · 340 So. 2d 110 - Bowen v. Willard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “By granting a new-trial order, the court effectively "disposed" of the motion for [judgment notwithstanding the verdict] until appellate review. By their very nature, a new-trial order and order for [judgment notwithstanding the verdict] are mutually inconsistent and may not be granted simultaneously. At most, the trial court may grant one and alternatively grant the other on the express condition that the latter only becomes effective if the former is reversed on appeal. Indeed, one of the primary reasons for allowing alternative motions for new trial and [judgment notwithstanding the verdict] is to promote judicial economy by consolidating the two issues on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.