508 So. 2d 413 - DRL, INC. v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2004
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stuart v. Stephanus · Torreyson v. Dutton · Hecht v. Wilson · Taff v. Hodge · Dean Ex Rel. v. Kane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if you don't pay your taxes the government will take your land.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The government exercises harsh remedies to collect its taxes. However, because the tax collection procedure meets constitutional due process and is established by statutory law, the fairness question is for the legislature, not for the judiciary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.