Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 508 So. 2d 427 - Garrett v. State

508 So. 2d 427 - Garrett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2004

5 state decisions

30198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tibbs v. Florida · 397 So. 2d 1120 - Tibbs v. State · 351 So. 2d 972 - McArthur v. State · 71 So. 2d 899 - Mayo v. State · 432 So. 2d 579 - Quintana v. De La Luz Quintana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There was considerable evidence presented relevant to the charges against codefendants Hope and Merckle. Nevertheless, there were only two circumstances from which any conduct on the part of Garrett in violation of the statutes proscribing bribery and unlawful compensation could be suspect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.