¶1We reverse the trial court’s order granting Redcliff Properties, Inc. (Redcliff) summary judgment because there remains a disputed issue of fact. Whether Redcliff retook possession of the property for its own account or for the account of Wester-strom is an unresolved and material issue of fact precluding summary judgment. See Hyman v. Cohen, 73 So.2d 393 (Fla.1954); Wolf v. Buchman, 425 So.2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Diehl v. Gibbs, 173 So.2d 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965). Accordingly, the summary judgment under review is reversed.
508 So. 2d 482
508 So.2d 482
12 Fla.L.Weekly 1434
Westerstrom v. Redcliff Properties, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 9, 1987
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-06-09
Relies on Hyman v. Cohen · Wolf v. Buchman · 173 So. 2d 719 - Diehl v. Gibbs
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1987-06-09
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2012
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →