Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

508 So. 2d 51

508 So.2d 51

12 Fla.L.Weekly 1453

Kinchen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-06-10

Relies on 446 So. 2d 1038 - Lusk v. State · 416 So. 2d 804 - McCray v. State · 476 So. 2d 150 - State v. Marshall

Decided 1987-06-10

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed. See State v. Marshall, 476 So.2d 150 (Fla.1985); Lusk v. State, 446 So.2d 1038 (Fla.1984); and McCray v. State, 416 So.2d 804 (Fla.1982). As we recently did in Ciccarelli v. State, 508 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), we certify the following as a question of great public importance:

IS IT NECESSARY, IN EVALUATING AN ASSERTION OF HARMLESS ERROR IN A CRIMINAL APPEAL, THAT EACH APPELLATE JUDGE INDEPENDENTLY READ THE COMPLETE TRIAL RECORD?
*52HERSEY, C.J., concurs in result only.ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., concur.
/508/so2d/51 · .json · Public domain