508 So. 2d 52 - Ciccarelli v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1988
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · United States v. Gay · State v. Dellorfano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Is it necessary, in evaluating an assertion of harmless error in a criminal appeal, that each appellate judge independently read the complete trial record?”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“In determining that the error involved herein was harmless we have relied extensively upon the review of the evidence set out in the parties' briefs and our own internal review process by which the court's legal staff directly examines the trial court record to be certain that the court is presented with an accurate description of the evidence. Each judge on the panel has not independently read the record in its entirety.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ciccarelli v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.