Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

508 So. 2d 527

508 So.2d 527

12 Fla.L.Weekly 1454

Deel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-06-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1988

1 state decisions

Relies on 488 So. 2d 826 - Florida Bar v. Baxter · 459 So. 2d 1037 - Protective Cas. Ins. Co. v. Killane · 466 So. 2d 212 - Spurlock v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-06-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

COWART, Judge.

¶1After his prior conviction was reversed1 the appellant pled nolo contendere and was resentenced. The sole contention on this appeal is that the trial court erred in failing to give proper credit for time served pursuant to § 921.161(1), Florida Statutes. This issue should be first raised in the trial court by motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 for the reasons explained in Meintzer v. State, 399 So.2d 133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). See also Everett v. State, 492 So.2d 861 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Spurlock v. State, 449 So.2d 973 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), rev. denied, 466 So.2d 212 (Fla.1985); Jensen v. State, 449 So.2d 969 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).2 The trial court’s judgment and sentence are affirmed without prejudice to the defendant seeking credit for time served by 3.850 motion.

¶2AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

¶3. Deel v. State, 481 So.2d 15 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), rev. denied, 488 So.2d 831 (Fla.1986).

¶4. Contra Dailey v. State, 471 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), approved as to different grounds, 488 So.2d 532 (Fla.1986); Van Ellis v. State, 455 So.2d 1065 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. dismissed, 459 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1984).

/508/so2d/527 · .json · Public domain