Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

508 So. 2d 560

508 So.2d 560

12 Fla.L.Weekly 1502

Docket Nos. 4-86-1849, 4-86-1866.

State v. Daise

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jacquiline DAISE, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Alfred DAISE, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-06-17

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1997

3 state decisions

Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · Dade County v. Baker · 443 So. 2d 302 - State v. Valdes

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-06-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert S. Jaegers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3STONE, Judge.

¶4The state appeals the dismissal of an information following the failure of a witness to appear for deposition. The trial judge had previously ordered the state to produce the witness, who was the victim of an aggravated child abuse. The mother of the victim also failed to appear at the depositions which were set for the day of the trial call. We reverse. State v. Wilson,498 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); State v. Evans,418 So.2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); State v. Lowe,398 So.2d 962 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); State v. Valdes,443 So.2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

¶5There are numerous remedies available to the court, in an appropriate case, when a state's witness fails to appear. The court may commence the trial without the witness; exclude the witness after a hearing following the criteria set forth in Richardson v. State,246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971); grant a continuance to the defense; issue a rule to show cause why the witness should not be held in contempt; hold the witness in contempt; issue a writ of body attachment; or impose other sanctions. Only the state however, may dispose of the case by a nolle prosequi. Cf. Wilson; Evans; Lowe; Valdes; State v. Merritt,394 So.2d 531 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Knight v. State,373 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), *561cert. denied,385 So.2d 761 (Fla. 1980); State v. Carda,495 So.2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

¶6We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.

¶7ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

/508/so2d/560 · .json · Public domain