Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 508 SO2D 596 - Scherer v. Chaisson

Scherer v. Chaisson’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1995
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 186 So. 2d 328 - Doty v. Central Mutual Insurance Company · Doty v. Central Mutual Insurance Co. · Doty v. Central Mutual Insurance · Lowery v. Zorn · 469 So. 2d 510 - Scherer v. Chaisson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Once the judgment of the Court of Appeal acquires the authority of the thing adjudged, the Court of Appeal loses the power and authority to reverse or modify that judgment. Wheat Inc. v. Caruthers, 439 So.2d 1065 (La.1983).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.