Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 508 SO2D 996 - State v. Cupit

State v. Cupit’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2019

17 state decisions

901987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Bram v. United States · Kissinger v. Halperin · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A convicted defendant's claim that counsel's assistance was so defective as to require reversal of a conviction ... has two components. First, the defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient.... Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. This requires showing that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “review of the issue on appeal is not concerned with weighing the sufficiency of the evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.