Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 508 S.W.2d 33 - Webster v. Commonwealth

Webster v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2017

17 state decisions

5019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Bradley v. Commonwealth · Ragland v. Commonwealth · Lynch v. Commonwealth · Reeves v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he function of instructions is only to state what the jury must believe from the evidence in order to return a verdict in favor of the party who bears the burden of proof. In Kentucky, the content of jury instructions on negligence should be couched in terms of duty. They should not contain an abundance of detail, but should provide only the ‘bare bones’ of the question for jury determination.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “sometimes matters more appropriately the subject of admonition are included with or as a part of the instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.