Guzman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2001
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Noah v. State · 134 Tex. Crim. 327 - Balch v. State · 165 Tex. Crim. 391 - Ervin v. State · Tyra v. State · 147 Tex. Crim. 54 - Crumpton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under the circumstances, if no further description of the house to be searched had been given, other than its number, a more serious question would have been presented. However, the executing officers were entitled to rely upon the entire description given in the warrant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rush v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.