Haley v. Palatnik’s Empirical Analysis
509 F.2d 1038 · 1975
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably Nolan v. Meyer (1975), Morrissey v. Curran (1977)
14 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 29 U.S.C. § 186 (§ 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on United States v. District Court · First National City Bank v. Banco Nacional de Cuba · Arroyo v. United States · Bowers v. Ulpiano Casal, Inc. · Lewis v. Mill Ridge Coals, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for the sole and exclusive benefit of the employees of such employer.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to protect the collective bargaining process by eliminating the corruptive influence of side payments by employers to union representatives.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baum v. Nolan · Baum v. Nolan“[Section 302], which was principally intended to protect the collective bargaining process by eliminating the cor-ruptive influence of side payments by employers to union representatives, 2 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad. News, 86th Cong., 1st Sess., at' 2326-27 (1959), prohibits anyone...who acts in the interest of an employer to ... agree to pay, lend, or deliver, any money or other thing of value (1) to any representative of any of his employees ... or (4) to any officer or employee of a labor organization ... with intent to influence him in respect to any of his actions, decisions, or duties ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.