Radcliff v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
509 F.2d 1093 · 1974
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently October 2010 · most notably Bromley v. Crisp (1977), Hooker v. State (1995)
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gideon v. Wainwright · Wolff v. McDonnell · Mapp v. Ohio · Stovall v. Denno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Lamb decision is the law of the circuit and we are concerned only with its retroactivity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““We have here no question of the accuracy of the fact-finding process. We assume that the adult proceedings to which these boys were subjected resulted in the determination of the truth.” 509 F.2d at 1095 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(i)t is still an unknown factor and ignored by the majority whether the juvenile court would nevertheless have certified these or many others of the many offenders as adults.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bromley v. Crisp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.