Danielson v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 501’s Empirical Analysis
509 F.2d 1371 · 1975
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 1999
14 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on New York Times Company v. United States · Haines v. Kerner · Castro v. United States · National Labor Relations Board v. Raytheon Co. · Danielson v. Joint Board of Coat, Suit & Allied Garment Workers' Union
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We feel justified, then, in taking appellant’s failure to seek expedited review as a recognition that there is no real danger of irreparable harm to the public interest in the limited period until the Board rules in the pending unfair labor practice proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where wiring systems and equipment are required for lighting, power, heat, etc., during the period of construction of a building, these systems and equipment shall be installed, maintained and operated by electrical workers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]his court stands ready, if the circumstances justify it, to give the fastest consideration consonant with sound judgment to cases in which ... any party ... seeks review of the grant or denial of preliminary relief,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.