Keiper v. Cupp’s Empirical Analysis
509 F.2d 238 · 1975
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2014
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Townsend v. Sain · Jackson v. Denno · Cupp v. Naughten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“had been advised * * * of his rights prior to, and at the time of the polygraph test, there is no reason to believe that he was not fully aware of those rights during the crucial period when his final story was taped.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to support appellant's contention that he should have been given another Miranda warning after being told of the `gross deceptive patterns' revealed in his polygraph test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may well be likened to a law clerk's memorandum”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.