Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 509 F.3d 1149 - Sparkman v. Commissioner

Sparkman v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

509 F.3d 1149 · 2007

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
June 2025
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Superior Trading, LLC v. Commissioner (2013), Debruce v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections (2014)

7 federal appellate · 2 district ·

570200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 170 · 26 U.S.C. § 6001 · 26 U.S.C. § 6651 · 26 U.S.C. § 6662 · 26 U.S.C. § 6664

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering · Gregory v. Helvering · Cohan v. Commissioner · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Culbertson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the burden of production rests on a party, a court may, at its discretion, presume or infer from that party’s failure to call a witness that the testimony the witness would have offered would not favor that party.”); United States v. Pagan-Santini, 451 F.3d 258 , 267 (1st Cir.2006) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An entity without economic substance, whether a sham partnership or a sham trust, is a sham either way and hence is not recognized for federal tax law purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.