Dewey v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
509 F.3d 447 · 2007
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 2014
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Keller v. Shalala · O'Donnell v. Barnhart · Miles v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reaching this conclusion [that Dewey’s testimony regarding the severity and functional consequences of his symptoms was not fully credible], substantial weight is being given to the opinions of the Disability Determination Service physicians as supported by and consistent with the evidence of the entire record (Social Security Ruling 96-6p). They determined that the claimant retains the ability to perform work at the light exertional level with some postural limitations. The undersigned agrees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Castano v. Astrue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.