Yan v. Mukasey’s Empirical Analysis
509 F.3d 63 · 2007
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Zhang v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service · Secaida-Rosales v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Cao He Lin v. United States Department of Justice · Twum v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Shi Liang Lin v. United States Department of Justice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 185 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dedji v. Mukasey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.