509 F. Supp. 162 - Pullman v. Chorney’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Although the plaintiff asserts his claim in various terms, the basic interest to which he claims actual injury is the right to have the drawing for leases under the SOG system be conducted fairly. Clearly, by alleging that the private defendants fraudulently submitted multiple applications, which illegally reduced the probability that the plaintiff’s application would be drawn, the plaintiff has in a sense alleged that the interest he asserts has suffered actual injury, (emphasis added)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 548 F. Supp. 466 - Arkla Exploration Co. v. Watt

2. “Even assuming that the plaintiff has alleged a “distinct and palpable injury,” however, this Court cannot perceive that the plaintiff has established the requisite connection between the claimed injury and the challenged conduct, or, as that requirement has also been stated, “that the exercise of the Court’s remedial powers would redress the claimed injuries.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 548 F. Supp. 466 - Arkla Exploration Co. v. Watt