Lucent Technologies Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 271
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · Allied Chemical Corporation v. Daiflon Inc · KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. · Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All New Work is treated as joint work. The intellectual property rights to that work will be jointly owned by AT & T and FhG [Fraunhofer]. Each party has the nonexclusive right to make use of the results of New Work (including intellectual property rights), and may grant nonexclusive licenses to others to use the results of such New Work.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] digital signal processor (DSP), a DSP with software, VLSI hardware embodiments, or hybrid DSP/VLSI embodiments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.