State v. Mandicino’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Ex Parte Williams (2001), State v. Oetken (2000)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Christie v. Rolscreen Co. · City of Des Moines v. Des Moines Police Bargaining Unit Ass'n · Superior/Ideal v. OSKALOOSA BD. OF REV. · State v. Ryan · McKim v. Petty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'where subject matter jurisdiction exists, an impediment to a court's authority can be obviated by consent, waiver or estoppel.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“A court may have subject matter jurisdiction but for one reason or another may not be able to entertain the particular case. In such a situation we say the court lacks authority to hear that particular case. Sometimes we have referred to “lack of authority to hear the particular case” as lack of jurisdiction of the case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.