Frick v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2005
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jos. A. Coy Co., Inc. v. Younger · 68 Okla. Crim. 359 - Lucas v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . The .determination of the issue of a violation of probation must be left to the trial court, and said court’s order of acceleration will not be reversed by this Court unless there is an abuse of discretion reflected in the record. . . .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Upon violation of the conditions of probation, the court may enter a judgment of guilt and proceed as provided in Section 1 of this act.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Anderson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.